Posted by
JP 5.56 on
10 March 2010, 9:34 am
I am pretty sure that I will be purchasing at least one new rifle at the end of next week, just in time for the start vacation. I just don’t know what exactly. I am leaning towards a .22, because I don’t have one. Everybody should have one right? I used to have a Ruger 10/22 but it was a lemon. I know that is not usually the case with the 10/22 so its on my list of considerations. However, I think I’d rather have a Bolt Action.
But here is the problem – which one? I am pretty uneducated when it comes to many things, and .22 rifles is one of them. I sort of like what I hear about Savage .22s, and I like their price points too – but I don’t know for sure? Is there a .22 Bolt Action that is similar to or better than the 10/22 in the aspects of accuracy and amount of aftermarket parts?
I am pretty sure I would go with out optics for a while and just concentrate on using iron sights (something I’ve not done in a LONG time with rifles) so whatever I buy must have iron sights on it.
On the other hand, we have the GSG-5. I hear nothing other than how fun they are. Maybe I’ll get a bolt .22 and the GSG?
Then on my third hand, if I am able to somehow find an M1 in a shop or private sale, for the right price – I’ll just get that instead. Or what if I find a .338 Lapua for getting into long range? That would be a lot of fun too.
Also, a few weeks ago I was playing Left 4 Dead 2 on the Xbox and picked up an AK-47. I heard the sound and got nostalgic. Then I got pissed off at myself for selling my AK-47 a few years ago. Maybe I should get another one? Or how about a retro M-16 style AR?
So many desires, not enough cash. Someone help me!?
Posted by
JP 5.56 on
9 March 2010, 4:39 pm
All this stuff going on with Starbucks, the Brady Campaign and their petition has me wondering: what good does a petition really do? If they get enough signatures and present it to Starbucks would Starbucks really reverse their decision?
If there was a petition to silence and stop the Brady Bunch, a petition to get them to reverse their position, and they were presented with signatures; would they do it? I find it very doubtful – but just for turds and chortles I have a little experiment. I ask you to head over to my Silence the Brady Campaign petition, and put your name on it. I really don’t think it’ll do any good, so lets just see if we can get more names then the gun grabbers?
Sign the petition here.
Posted by
JP 5.56 on
5 March 2010, 8:27 am
Forget the hoary arguments about the .270 versus the .30/06. If you want to get some heat going among gun owners, ask what makes for the best zombie gun. [Full Article]
I still believe that my AR-15 is the best choice for a zombie gun. Thank SayUncle for pointing us to the article.
Posted by
JP 5.56 on
3 March 2010, 8:03 pm
More from AZCDL.org today:
March 3, 2010
Firearms preemption debate March 4, 2010.
We are expecting SB 1168 to be scheduled on the Senate Committee of the Whole (COW) agenda for Thursday, March 4, 2010. SB 1168 strengthens state firearms preemption laws, adds firearms storage and accessories to the list of things political subdivisions cannot regulate, and removes the prohibition on carrying a firearm in public parks without a CCW permit.
Please contact your Senator urging them to support SB 1168 during the COW debate.
[See the link above for original article as well as a link to send a prepared letter to your legislators]
Posted by
JP 5.56 on
1 March 2010, 10:34 am
Now Microsoft and Apple free. Well almost.
I am running Linux mint on both of my personal machines, though I keep the laptop in dual boot config with Windows for work reasons; but I will rarely need it.
I also now have all my music on my Droid and no longer need my commIpod touch.
Freedom is good.
Posted by
JP 5.56 on
1 March 2010, 8:54 am
I’ve got a couple thoughts on this: At this point, I’m not to worried about it, the reject can’t even get his precious “health care reform” passed, and secondly – Americans wont stand for it.
The Obama administration will seek to reinstate the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 during the Bush administration, Attorney General Eric Holder said today.
“As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons,” Holder told reporters.
Holder said that putting the ban back in place would not only be a positive move by the United States, it would help cut down on the flow of guns going across the border into Mexico, which is struggling with heavy violence among drug cartels along the border.
“I think that will have a positive impact in Mexico, at a minimum.” Holder said at a news conference on the arrest of more than 700 people in a drug enforcement crackdown on Mexican drug cartels operating in the U.S. [Full Article]
Posted by
JP 5.56 on
1 March 2010, 8:41 am
Another great webcomic.

Click the picture to get the full size version over at xkcd.com!